<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: re: Obama Scowcroft &#8212; is Obama in bed with the Mullahs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obamapundit.com/2009/06/18/re-obama-scowcroft-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-mullahs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obamapundit.com/2009/06/18/re-obama-scowcroft-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-mullahs/</link>
	<description>analysis, comedy and general pundity re: our 44th President</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:00:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EsotericWombat</title>
		<link>http://www.obamapundit.com/2009/06/18/re-obama-scowcroft-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-mullahs/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>EsotericWombat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamapundit.com/?p=293#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&quot;we’re still awaiting even one comment from Obama to the effect that the Iranian people have the right to self-determination.&quot;

You mean just like you&#039;re still waiting for the birth certificate that Obama made available?

Obama hasn&#039;t opened his mouth on this issue without stressing that this is a matter that needs to be decided by the Iranian people.

And I&#039;m sorry, but since when were George Bush, Karl Rove, or Dick Cheney Jewish?  Ask anyone to name prominent neo-cons and I&#039;ll bet you any amount of money that the only Jew mentioned would be Henry Kissinger.

You really don&#039;t have a leg to stand on here.  I half expected you to suggest that he was in league with the Ayatollah because he&#039;s a secret Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we’re still awaiting even one comment from Obama to the effect that the Iranian people have the right to self-determination.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean just like you&#8217;re still waiting for the birth certificate that Obama made available?</p>
<p>Obama hasn&#8217;t opened his mouth on this issue without stressing that this is a matter that needs to be decided by the Iranian people.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m sorry, but since when were George Bush, Karl Rove, or Dick Cheney Jewish?  Ask anyone to name prominent neo-cons and I&#8217;ll bet you any amount of money that the only Jew mentioned would be Henry Kissinger.</p>
<p>You really don&#8217;t have a leg to stand on here.  I half expected you to suggest that he was in league with the Ayatollah because he&#8217;s a secret Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris King</title>
		<link>http://www.obamapundit.com/2009/06/18/re-obama-scowcroft-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-mullahs/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamapundit.com/?p=293#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Quote: I can’t bend my mind enough to figure out how proclaiming that “the Supreme Leader of Iran is worried about the legitimacy of the election”  reconciles with a non-recognition of Ahmadinejad as the “election winner.”

Did... er, did you try reading? He states that even the Supreme Leader (technically an &quot;honorific&quot; as in title, but not praise - your choice of words is a tad misleading there) has doubts about the legitimacy of the election... how do you see that as recognizing Ahmadinejad?  If this requires mental gymnastics, you might be over-thinking it?  I dunno, perhaps I&#039;m missing something.

It&#039;s interesting though: whether you&#039;re a crackpot on the left or a crackpot on the right, you can see Obama&#039;s measured response as being indicative of the sinister ulterior motive of keeping Ahmadinejad in power.  Fascinating.  I should introduce you to one of my socialist friends, he&#039;s been telling me the same thing you&#039;re writing here. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: I can’t bend my mind enough to figure out how proclaiming that “the Supreme Leader of Iran is worried about the legitimacy of the election”  reconciles with a non-recognition of Ahmadinejad as the “election winner.”</p>
<p>Did&#8230; er, did you try reading? He states that even the Supreme Leader (technically an &#8220;honorific&#8221; as in title, but not praise &#8211; your choice of words is a tad misleading there) has doubts about the legitimacy of the election&#8230; how do you see that as recognizing Ahmadinejad?  If this requires mental gymnastics, you might be over-thinking it?  I dunno, perhaps I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting though: whether you&#8217;re a crackpot on the left or a crackpot on the right, you can see Obama&#8217;s measured response as being indicative of the sinister ulterior motive of keeping Ahmadinejad in power.  Fascinating.  I should introduce you to one of my socialist friends, he&#8217;s been telling me the same thing you&#8217;re writing here. <img src='http://www.obamapundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.obamapundit.com/2009/06/18/re-obama-scowcroft-is-obama-in-bed-with-the-mullahs/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obamapundit.com/?p=293#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Well, with your final comment you essentially prove Sullivan and other commentators&#039; points. The Iranian government is actively trying to link this uprising to American intervention, since doing so might be their only chance to successfully quash it. 

If Obama publicly comes out hard against the government, he will be making their job a lot easier. He has to acknowledge Khamenei as the Supreme Leader because that is what he is... until the people overthrow him. So long as this fight stays a battle between Iranians, the rage will just continue to build, and the regime won&#039;t have anywhere to redirect the flood. No people on Earth have historically been so successful, so quickly, at overthrowing their existing leadership as the Iranians; the mullahs must be terrified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with your final comment you essentially prove Sullivan and other commentators&#8217; points. The Iranian government is actively trying to link this uprising to American intervention, since doing so might be their only chance to successfully quash it. </p>
<p>If Obama publicly comes out hard against the government, he will be making their job a lot easier. He has to acknowledge Khamenei as the Supreme Leader because that is what he is&#8230; until the people overthrow him. So long as this fight stays a battle between Iranians, the rage will just continue to build, and the regime won&#8217;t have anywhere to redirect the flood. No people on Earth have historically been so successful, so quickly, at overthrowing their existing leadership as the Iranians; the mullahs must be terrified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
